feat: add forensic sample analysis
This commit is contained in:
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ have no working implementation in the codebase yet.
|
||||
without affecting aggregate compliance statistics. Operators can configure forensic
|
||||
email-address and token redaction under Settings.
|
||||
- [x] Forensic report parsing
|
||||
- [ ] Failure sample analysis
|
||||
- [x] Failure sample analysis
|
||||
- [x] PII redaction options
|
||||
- [x] Detailed authentication failure views
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ from app.core.database import get_db
|
||||
from app.core.security import require_admin_auth
|
||||
from app.models.domain import Domain
|
||||
from app.models.report import ForensicReport
|
||||
from app.services.forensic_analysis import analyze_forensic_report, summarize_forensic_samples
|
||||
from app.services.forensic_parser import ForensicParser, MAX_FORENSIC_REPORT_SIZE
|
||||
from app.services.forensic_persistence import (
|
||||
forensic_report_exists,
|
||||
@@ -22,6 +23,45 @@ logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
||||
router = APIRouter()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ForensicSampleAnalysisResponse(BaseModel):
|
||||
id: int
|
||||
report_id: str
|
||||
domain: Optional[str] = None
|
||||
source_ip: Optional[str] = None
|
||||
auth_failure: str
|
||||
delivery_result: Optional[str] = None
|
||||
priority: str
|
||||
diagnosis: str
|
||||
recommendations: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
|
||||
signals: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
|
||||
authentication_results: Dict[str, str] = Field(default_factory=dict)
|
||||
dkim_domain: Optional[str] = None
|
||||
mail_from_domain: Optional[str] = None
|
||||
privacy_note: str
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ForensicAnalysisGroupResponse(BaseModel):
|
||||
key: str
|
||||
domain: str
|
||||
source_ip: str
|
||||
auth_failure: str
|
||||
delivery_result: str
|
||||
count: int
|
||||
priority: str
|
||||
latest_arrival: Optional[str] = None
|
||||
diagnosis: str
|
||||
recommendations: List[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ForensicAnalysisResponse(BaseModel):
|
||||
total: int
|
||||
priority_counts: Dict[str, int] = Field(default_factory=dict)
|
||||
failure_counts: Dict[str, int] = Field(default_factory=dict)
|
||||
result_counts: Dict[str, int] = Field(default_factory=dict)
|
||||
groups: List[ForensicAnalysisGroupResponse] = Field(default_factory=list)
|
||||
samples: List[ForensicSampleAnalysisResponse] = Field(default_factory=list)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ForensicReportResponse(BaseModel):
|
||||
id: int
|
||||
report_id: str
|
||||
@@ -44,6 +84,7 @@ class ForensicReportResponse(BaseModel):
|
||||
original_date: Optional[str] = None
|
||||
feedback_headers: Dict[str, Any] = Field(default_factory=dict)
|
||||
processed_at: Optional[str] = None
|
||||
analysis: Optional[ForensicSampleAnalysisResponse] = None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ForensicListResponse(BaseModel):
|
||||
@@ -79,6 +120,35 @@ def _validate_upload(file: UploadFile, content: bytes) -> None:
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _filtered_forensic_query(
|
||||
db: Session,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
domain: Optional[str] = None,
|
||||
source_ip: Optional[str] = None,
|
||||
auth_failure: Optional[str] = None,
|
||||
delivery_result: Optional[str] = None,
|
||||
):
|
||||
query = db.query(ForensicReport).options(selectinload(ForensicReport.domain))
|
||||
if domain:
|
||||
normalized = domain.lower()
|
||||
query = query.outerjoin(Domain).filter(
|
||||
(Domain.name == normalized) | (ForensicReport.reported_domain == normalized)
|
||||
)
|
||||
if source_ip:
|
||||
query = query.filter(ForensicReport.source_ip == source_ip.strip())
|
||||
if auth_failure:
|
||||
query = query.filter(ForensicReport.auth_failure == auth_failure.strip().lower())
|
||||
if delivery_result:
|
||||
query = query.filter(ForensicReport.delivery_result == delivery_result.strip().lower())
|
||||
return query
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _response_for_row(row: ForensicReport, redaction_policy) -> ForensicReportResponse:
|
||||
data = forensic_report_to_dict(row, redaction_policy=redaction_policy)
|
||||
data["analysis"] = analyze_forensic_report(row)
|
||||
return ForensicReportResponse(**data)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@router.post("/upload", response_model=ForensicUploadResponse)
|
||||
async def upload_forensic_report(
|
||||
file: UploadFile = File(...),
|
||||
@@ -138,19 +208,13 @@ async def list_forensic_reports(
|
||||
_auth: dict = Depends(require_admin_auth),
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""List stored forensic reports, newest first."""
|
||||
query = db.query(ForensicReport).options(selectinload(ForensicReport.domain))
|
||||
if domain:
|
||||
normalized = domain.lower()
|
||||
query = query.outerjoin(Domain).filter(
|
||||
(Domain.name == normalized) | (ForensicReport.reported_domain == normalized)
|
||||
query = _filtered_forensic_query(
|
||||
db,
|
||||
domain=domain,
|
||||
source_ip=source_ip,
|
||||
auth_failure=auth_failure,
|
||||
delivery_result=delivery_result,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if source_ip:
|
||||
query = query.filter(ForensicReport.source_ip == source_ip.strip())
|
||||
if auth_failure:
|
||||
query = query.filter(ForensicReport.auth_failure == auth_failure.strip().lower())
|
||||
if delivery_result:
|
||||
query = query.filter(ForensicReport.delivery_result == delivery_result.strip().lower())
|
||||
|
||||
total = query.count()
|
||||
rows = (
|
||||
query.order_by(ForensicReport.arrival_date.desc().nullslast(), ForensicReport.id.desc())
|
||||
@@ -165,13 +229,34 @@ async def list_forensic_reports(
|
||||
page=page,
|
||||
page_size=page_size,
|
||||
total_pages=total_pages,
|
||||
reports=[
|
||||
ForensicReportResponse(
|
||||
**forensic_report_to_dict(row, redaction_policy=redaction_policy)
|
||||
reports=[_response_for_row(row, redaction_policy) for row in rows],
|
||||
)
|
||||
for row in rows
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@router.get("/analysis", response_model=ForensicAnalysisResponse)
|
||||
async def analyze_forensic_reports(
|
||||
domain: Optional[str] = Query(default=None),
|
||||
source_ip: Optional[str] = Query(default=None),
|
||||
auth_failure: Optional[str] = Query(default=None),
|
||||
delivery_result: Optional[str] = Query(default=None),
|
||||
page_size: int = Query(default=200, ge=1, le=500),
|
||||
db: Session = Depends(get_db),
|
||||
_auth: dict = Depends(require_admin_auth),
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""Summarize stored forensic samples into operator investigation groups."""
|
||||
query = _filtered_forensic_query(
|
||||
db,
|
||||
domain=domain,
|
||||
source_ip=source_ip,
|
||||
auth_failure=auth_failure,
|
||||
delivery_result=delivery_result,
|
||||
)
|
||||
rows = (
|
||||
query.order_by(ForensicReport.arrival_date.desc().nullslast(), ForensicReport.id.desc())
|
||||
.limit(page_size)
|
||||
.all()
|
||||
)
|
||||
return ForensicAnalysisResponse(**summarize_forensic_samples(rows))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@router.get("/{report_id}", response_model=ForensicReportResponse)
|
||||
@@ -192,4 +277,4 @@ async def get_forensic_report(
|
||||
status_code=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND, detail="Forensic report not found"
|
||||
)
|
||||
redaction_policy = get_forensic_redaction_policy(db)
|
||||
return ForensicReportResponse(**forensic_report_to_dict(row, redaction_policy=redaction_policy))
|
||||
return _response_for_row(row, redaction_policy)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import re
|
||||
from collections import Counter
|
||||
from datetime import datetime
|
||||
from typing import Any, Dict, Iterable, List, Optional, Tuple
|
||||
|
||||
from app.models.report import ForensicReport
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
AUTH_RESULT_PATTERN = re.compile(r"\b(dkim|spf|dmarc)=([a-zA-Z0-9_-]+)", re.IGNORECASE)
|
||||
HEADER_DOMAIN_PATTERN = re.compile(r"\bheader\.d=([^;\s]+)", re.IGNORECASE)
|
||||
MAILFROM_DOMAIN_PATTERN = re.compile(r"\bsmtp\.mailfrom=([^;\s]+)", re.IGNORECASE)
|
||||
PRIORITY_ORDER = {"high": 3, "medium": 2, "low": 1}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _clean_value(value: Any) -> str:
|
||||
return str(value or "").strip()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _normalize(value: Any) -> str:
|
||||
return _clean_value(value).lower()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _feedback_headers(row: ForensicReport) -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
if not row.feedback_headers:
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
try:
|
||||
parsed = json.loads(row.feedback_headers)
|
||||
except (json.JSONDecodeError, TypeError):
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
return parsed if isinstance(parsed, dict) else {}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_authentication_results(value: str) -> Dict[str, str]:
|
||||
results: Dict[str, str] = {}
|
||||
for mechanism, result in AUTH_RESULT_PATTERN.findall(value or ""):
|
||||
results[mechanism.lower()] = result.lower()
|
||||
return results
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _first_match(pattern: re.Pattern[str], value: str) -> str:
|
||||
match = pattern.search(value or "")
|
||||
return match.group(1).lower().strip(".,") if match else ""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _failure_kind(row: ForensicReport, auth_results: Dict[str, str]) -> str:
|
||||
reported = _normalize(row.auth_failure)
|
||||
if reported in {"dkim", "spf", "dmarc", "both"}:
|
||||
return reported
|
||||
failed = {name for name, result in auth_results.items() if result in {"fail", "softfail"}}
|
||||
if {"dkim", "spf"}.issubset(failed):
|
||||
return "both"
|
||||
for mechanism in ("dmarc", "dkim", "spf"):
|
||||
if mechanism in failed:
|
||||
return mechanism
|
||||
return reported or "unknown"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _priority(row: ForensicReport, failure_kind: str) -> str:
|
||||
delivery = _normalize(row.delivery_result)
|
||||
if delivery in {"reject", "quarantine"}:
|
||||
return "high"
|
||||
if failure_kind in {"both", "dmarc"}:
|
||||
return "high"
|
||||
if failure_kind in {"dkim", "spf"}:
|
||||
return "medium"
|
||||
return "low"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _diagnosis(failure_kind: str, auth_results: Dict[str, str], delivery_result: str) -> str:
|
||||
delivery = _normalize(delivery_result)
|
||||
rejected = delivery in {"reject", "quarantine"}
|
||||
suffix = " The receiver enforced the failure." if rejected else ""
|
||||
if failure_kind == "both":
|
||||
return "Both DKIM and SPF failed, so DMARC could not find an aligned pass." + suffix
|
||||
if failure_kind == "dmarc":
|
||||
return "DMARC failed after the receiver evaluated DKIM and SPF alignment." + suffix
|
||||
if failure_kind == "dkim":
|
||||
if auth_results.get("spf") == "pass":
|
||||
return "DKIM failed while SPF passed; focus on DKIM signing and alignment." + suffix
|
||||
return "DKIM failed for the reported message sample." + suffix
|
||||
if failure_kind == "spf":
|
||||
if auth_results.get("dkim") == "pass":
|
||||
return (
|
||||
"SPF failed while DKIM passed; focus on SPF authorization and alignment." + suffix
|
||||
)
|
||||
return "SPF failed for the reported message sample." + suffix
|
||||
return "The receiver reported an authentication failure, but did not include a clear mechanism."
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _recommendations(
|
||||
failure_kind: str,
|
||||
auth_results: Dict[str, str],
|
||||
source_ip: str,
|
||||
reported_domain: str,
|
||||
) -> List[str]:
|
||||
actions: List[str] = []
|
||||
if failure_kind in {"dkim", "both", "dmarc"}:
|
||||
actions.append(
|
||||
"Confirm the sending system signs mail with a DKIM domain aligned to the visible From domain."
|
||||
)
|
||||
actions.append(
|
||||
"Check recent DKIM key, selector, and canonicalization changes for this sender."
|
||||
)
|
||||
if failure_kind in {"spf", "both", "dmarc"}:
|
||||
actions.append(
|
||||
"Verify the source IP or provider include is authorized in the domain SPF record."
|
||||
)
|
||||
actions.append(
|
||||
"Review forwarding paths, because forwarding commonly breaks SPF while preserving DKIM."
|
||||
)
|
||||
if auth_results.get("spf") == "pass" and failure_kind == "dkim":
|
||||
actions.append(
|
||||
"If SPF is aligned and passing, this may be a DKIM-only repair rather than a sender authorization issue."
|
||||
)
|
||||
if auth_results.get("dkim") == "pass" and failure_kind == "spf":
|
||||
actions.append(
|
||||
"If DKIM is aligned and passing, treat SPF repair as lower risk before changing DMARC policy."
|
||||
)
|
||||
if source_ip:
|
||||
actions.append(
|
||||
f"Compare {source_ip} with known mail sources for {reported_domain or 'this domain'}."
|
||||
)
|
||||
actions.append(
|
||||
"Keep using redacted forensic metadata; do not import or retain message bodies for this investigation."
|
||||
)
|
||||
return actions
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _signals(
|
||||
row: ForensicReport,
|
||||
feedback_headers: Dict[str, Any],
|
||||
auth_results: Dict[str, str],
|
||||
header_domain: str,
|
||||
mailfrom_domain: str,
|
||||
) -> List[str]:
|
||||
signals = []
|
||||
if row.source_ip:
|
||||
signals.append(f"Source IP: {row.source_ip}")
|
||||
if row.reported_domain:
|
||||
signals.append(f"Reported domain: {row.reported_domain}")
|
||||
if row.auth_failure:
|
||||
signals.append(f"Failure: {row.auth_failure}")
|
||||
if row.delivery_result:
|
||||
signals.append(f"Delivery result: {row.delivery_result}")
|
||||
if header_domain:
|
||||
signals.append(f"DKIM header domain: {header_domain}")
|
||||
if mailfrom_domain:
|
||||
signals.append(f"SPF mail-from domain: {mailfrom_domain}")
|
||||
identity_alignment = _clean_value(feedback_headers.get("identity_alignment"))
|
||||
if identity_alignment:
|
||||
signals.append(f"Identity alignment: {identity_alignment}")
|
||||
for mechanism, result in sorted(auth_results.items()):
|
||||
signals.append(f"{mechanism.upper()} result: {result}")
|
||||
return signals
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def analyze_forensic_report(row: ForensicReport) -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Build a privacy-preserving operator analysis for one forensic sample."""
|
||||
feedback_headers = _feedback_headers(row)
|
||||
auth_results = _parse_authentication_results(row.authentication_results or "")
|
||||
header_domain = _first_match(
|
||||
HEADER_DOMAIN_PATTERN, row.authentication_results or ""
|
||||
) or _normalize(feedback_headers.get("dkim_domain"))
|
||||
mailfrom_domain = _first_match(MAILFROM_DOMAIN_PATTERN, row.authentication_results or "")
|
||||
failure_kind = _failure_kind(row, auth_results)
|
||||
priority = _priority(row, failure_kind)
|
||||
reported_domain = _clean_value(row.reported_domain or (row.domain.name if row.domain else ""))
|
||||
source_ip = _clean_value(row.source_ip)
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"id": row.id,
|
||||
"report_id": row.report_id,
|
||||
"domain": reported_domain,
|
||||
"source_ip": source_ip,
|
||||
"auth_failure": failure_kind,
|
||||
"delivery_result": _clean_value(row.delivery_result),
|
||||
"priority": priority,
|
||||
"diagnosis": _diagnosis(failure_kind, auth_results, row.delivery_result or ""),
|
||||
"recommendations": _recommendations(
|
||||
failure_kind,
|
||||
auth_results,
|
||||
source_ip,
|
||||
reported_domain,
|
||||
),
|
||||
"signals": _signals(row, feedback_headers, auth_results, header_domain, mailfrom_domain),
|
||||
"authentication_results": auth_results,
|
||||
"dkim_domain": header_domain,
|
||||
"mail_from_domain": mailfrom_domain,
|
||||
"privacy_note": "Analysis uses redacted headers and metadata only; message bodies are not stored.",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _group_key(row: ForensicReport) -> Tuple[str, str, str, str]:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
_clean_value(row.reported_domain or (row.domain.name if row.domain else "")) or "unknown",
|
||||
_clean_value(row.source_ip) or "unknown",
|
||||
_normalize(row.auth_failure) or "unknown",
|
||||
_normalize(row.delivery_result) or "unknown",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _latest(left: Optional[datetime], right: Optional[datetime]) -> Optional[datetime]:
|
||||
if left is None:
|
||||
return right
|
||||
if right is None:
|
||||
return left
|
||||
return max(left, right)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def summarize_forensic_samples(rows: Iterable[ForensicReport]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""Summarize forensic samples into investigation groups and top examples."""
|
||||
reports = list(rows)
|
||||
analyses = [analyze_forensic_report(row) for row in reports]
|
||||
priority_counts = Counter(item["priority"] for item in analyses)
|
||||
failure_counts = Counter(item["auth_failure"] for item in analyses)
|
||||
result_counts = Counter(_normalize(row.delivery_result) or "unknown" for row in reports)
|
||||
grouped: Dict[Tuple[str, str, str, str], Dict[str, Any]] = {}
|
||||
|
||||
for row, analysis in zip(reports, analyses):
|
||||
key = _group_key(row)
|
||||
group = grouped.setdefault(
|
||||
key,
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": "|".join(key),
|
||||
"domain": key[0],
|
||||
"source_ip": key[1],
|
||||
"auth_failure": analysis["auth_failure"],
|
||||
"delivery_result": key[3],
|
||||
"count": 0,
|
||||
"priority": analysis["priority"],
|
||||
"latest_arrival": None,
|
||||
"diagnosis": analysis["diagnosis"],
|
||||
"recommendations": analysis["recommendations"][:3],
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
group["count"] += 1
|
||||
group["latest_arrival"] = _latest(
|
||||
group["latest_arrival"], row.arrival_date or row.processed_at
|
||||
)
|
||||
if PRIORITY_ORDER[analysis["priority"]] > PRIORITY_ORDER[group["priority"]]:
|
||||
group["priority"] = analysis["priority"]
|
||||
group["diagnosis"] = analysis["diagnosis"]
|
||||
group["recommendations"] = analysis["recommendations"][:3]
|
||||
|
||||
groups = sorted(
|
||||
grouped.values(),
|
||||
key=lambda item: (
|
||||
PRIORITY_ORDER[item["priority"]],
|
||||
item["count"],
|
||||
item["latest_arrival"] or datetime.min,
|
||||
),
|
||||
reverse=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
for group in groups:
|
||||
if group["latest_arrival"] is not None:
|
||||
group["latest_arrival"] = group["latest_arrival"].isoformat()
|
||||
|
||||
samples = sorted(
|
||||
analyses,
|
||||
key=lambda item: (PRIORITY_ORDER[item["priority"]], item["id"] or 0),
|
||||
reverse=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"total": len(reports),
|
||||
"priority_counts": dict(priority_counts),
|
||||
"failure_counts": dict(failure_counts),
|
||||
"result_counts": dict(result_counts),
|
||||
"groups": groups,
|
||||
"samples": samples,
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -61,6 +61,42 @@
|
||||
{% endcall %}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
{% call card() %}
|
||||
{% call card_header() %}
|
||||
<div class="flex flex-col gap-2 md:flex-row md:items-start md:justify-between">
|
||||
<div>
|
||||
{% call card_title() %}Failure Sample Analysis{% endcall %}
|
||||
{% call card_description() %}Privacy-preserving diagnosis from the redacted failure sample{% endcall %}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<span class="badge uppercase" :class="priorityClass(report.analysis?.priority)" x-text="report.analysis?.priority || 'unknown'"></span>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
{% endcall %}
|
||||
{% call card_content() %}
|
||||
<div class="space-y-4">
|
||||
<p class="font-medium" x-text="report.analysis?.diagnosis || 'No analysis is available for this sample.'"></p>
|
||||
<div class="grid grid-cols-1 lg:grid-cols-2 gap-4">
|
||||
<div>
|
||||
<p class="text-sm font-semibold mb-2">Recommended Actions</p>
|
||||
<ul class="text-sm space-y-1 list-disc pl-4">
|
||||
<template x-for="action in report.analysis?.recommendations || []" :key="action">
|
||||
<li x-text="action"></li>
|
||||
</template>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div>
|
||||
<p class="text-sm font-semibold mb-2">Signals</p>
|
||||
<ul class="text-sm space-y-1 list-disc pl-4">
|
||||
<template x-for="signal in report.analysis?.signals || []" :key="signal">
|
||||
<li x-text="signal"></li>
|
||||
</template>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<p class="text-xs text-base-content/60" x-text="report.analysis?.privacy_note"></p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
{% endcall %}
|
||||
{% endcall %}
|
||||
|
||||
{% call card() %}
|
||||
{% call card_header() %}
|
||||
{% call card_title() %}Message Identity{% endcall %}
|
||||
@@ -160,6 +196,11 @@ function forensicReportDetailApp(reportId) {
|
||||
labelize(value) {
|
||||
return String(value || '').replaceAll('_', ' ').replace(/\b\w/g, (char) => char.toUpperCase());
|
||||
},
|
||||
priorityClass(priority) {
|
||||
if (priority === 'high') return 'badge-error';
|
||||
if (priority === 'medium') return 'badge-warning';
|
||||
return 'badge-ghost';
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
</script>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -101,6 +101,49 @@
|
||||
{% endcall %}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
{% call card() %}
|
||||
{% call card_header() %}
|
||||
<div class="flex flex-col gap-2 md:flex-row md:items-start md:justify-between">
|
||||
<div>
|
||||
{% call card_title() %}Sample Analysis{% endcall %}
|
||||
{% call card_description() %}Grouped investigation hints from redacted forensic metadata{% endcall %}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div class="flex gap-2">
|
||||
<span class="badge badge-error badge-outline">High <span x-text="analysis.priority_counts?.high || 0"></span></span>
|
||||
<span class="badge badge-warning badge-outline">Medium <span x-text="analysis.priority_counts?.medium || 0"></span></span>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
{% endcall %}
|
||||
{% call card_content() %}
|
||||
<template x-if="analysis.groups.length === 0">
|
||||
<p class="text-base-content/60">No failure samples are available for analysis.</p>
|
||||
</template>
|
||||
<div class="grid grid-cols-1 lg:grid-cols-3 gap-4" x-show="analysis.groups.length > 0">
|
||||
<template x-for="group in analysis.groups.slice(0, 3)" :key="group.key">
|
||||
<div class="border border-base-300 rounded-md p-4 space-y-3">
|
||||
<div class="flex items-start justify-between gap-3">
|
||||
<div class="min-w-0">
|
||||
<p class="font-semibold break-words" x-text="group.domain"></p>
|
||||
<p class="text-sm font-mono text-base-content/70" x-text="group.source_ip"></p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<span class="badge uppercase" :class="priorityClass(group.priority)" x-text="group.priority"></span>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<p class="text-sm" x-text="group.diagnosis"></p>
|
||||
<ul class="text-sm space-y-1 list-disc pl-4">
|
||||
<template x-for="action in group.recommendations.slice(0, 2)" :key="action">
|
||||
<li x-text="action"></li>
|
||||
</template>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
<div class="flex items-center justify-between text-xs text-base-content/60">
|
||||
<span><span x-text="group.count"></span> samples</span>
|
||||
<span class="uppercase" x-text="group.auth_failure"></span>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</template>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
{% endcall %}
|
||||
{% endcall %}
|
||||
|
||||
{% call card() %}
|
||||
{% call card_header() %}
|
||||
<div class="flex items-center justify-between gap-4">
|
||||
@@ -173,6 +216,7 @@ function forensicReportsApp() {
|
||||
uploadError: false,
|
||||
selectedFile: null,
|
||||
reports: [],
|
||||
analysis: { groups: [], priority_counts: {}, failure_counts: {}, result_counts: {}, samples: [] },
|
||||
domainOptions: [],
|
||||
total: 0,
|
||||
filters: {
|
||||
@@ -220,6 +264,7 @@ function forensicReportsApp() {
|
||||
const data = await response.json();
|
||||
this.reports = data.reports || [];
|
||||
this.total = data.total || 0;
|
||||
await this.fetchAnalysis(params);
|
||||
if (!this.filters.domain) {
|
||||
this.domainOptions = [...new Set(this.reports.map((report) => report.domain || report.reported_domain).filter(Boolean))].sort();
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -229,6 +274,11 @@ function forensicReportsApp() {
|
||||
this.loading = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
async fetchAnalysis(params) {
|
||||
const response = await fetch(`/api/v1/forensics/analysis?${params.toString()}`);
|
||||
if (!response.ok) throw new Error('Unable to analyze forensic reports');
|
||||
this.analysis = await response.json();
|
||||
},
|
||||
async uploadReport() {
|
||||
if (!this.selectedFile) return;
|
||||
this.uploading = true;
|
||||
@@ -262,6 +312,11 @@ function forensicReportsApp() {
|
||||
const date = new Date(value);
|
||||
return Number.isNaN(date.getTime()) ? value : date.toLocaleString();
|
||||
},
|
||||
priorityClass(priority) {
|
||||
if (priority === 'high') return 'badge-error';
|
||||
if (priority === 'medium') return 'badge-warning';
|
||||
return 'badge-ghost';
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
</script>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -90,6 +90,54 @@ def test_list_forensic_reports_filters_failure_fields(authed_client, db_session)
|
||||
assert data["reports"][0]["report_id"] == "ruf-spf-filter-test"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_forensic_analysis_groups_failure_samples(authed_client, db_session):
|
||||
dkim = ForensicParser.parse_bytes(SAMPLE_FORENSIC_EMAIL)
|
||||
spf = dict(dkim)
|
||||
spf.update(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"report_id": "ruf-spf-analysis-test",
|
||||
"reported_domain": "example.com",
|
||||
"source_ip": "198.51.100.23",
|
||||
"auth_failure": "spf",
|
||||
"delivery_result": "quarantine",
|
||||
"authentication_results": (
|
||||
"mx.example.net; dkim=pass header.d=example.com; "
|
||||
"spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=example.com; dmarc=fail"
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
save_forensic_report(db_session, dkim)
|
||||
save_forensic_report(db_session, spf)
|
||||
db_session.commit()
|
||||
|
||||
response = authed_client.get("/api/v1/forensics/analysis?domain=example.com")
|
||||
|
||||
assert response.status_code == 200
|
||||
data = response.json()
|
||||
assert data["total"] == 2
|
||||
assert data["priority_counts"]["high"] == 2
|
||||
assert data["failure_counts"]["dkim"] == 1
|
||||
assert data["failure_counts"]["spf"] == 1
|
||||
assert data["groups"][0]["priority"] == "high"
|
||||
assert "redacted headers and metadata only" in data["samples"][0]["privacy_note"]
|
||||
assert any("SPF" in action for action in data["samples"][0]["recommendations"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_forensic_report_responses_include_sample_analysis(authed_client):
|
||||
authed_client.post(
|
||||
"/api/v1/forensics/upload",
|
||||
files={"file": ("report.eml", SAMPLE_FORENSIC_EMAIL, "message/rfc822")},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
list_response = authed_client.get("/api/v1/forensics")
|
||||
|
||||
assert list_response.status_code == 200
|
||||
item = list_response.json()["reports"][0]
|
||||
assert item["analysis"]["priority"] == "high"
|
||||
assert "DKIM" in item["analysis"]["diagnosis"]
|
||||
assert item["original_subject"] not in item["analysis"]["signals"]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_forensic_api_applies_configured_redaction_policy(authed_client, db_session):
|
||||
authed_client.post(
|
||||
"/api/v1/forensics/upload",
|
||||
@@ -216,6 +264,7 @@ def test_forensic_html_pages_render():
|
||||
assert "Authentication Failures" in list_response.text
|
||||
assert detail_response.status_code == 200
|
||||
assert "Forensic Investigation" in detail_response.text
|
||||
assert "Failure Sample Analysis" in detail_response.text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_save_forensic_report_duplicate_and_invalid_domain_paths(db_session):
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-3
@@ -175,9 +175,7 @@ Delivered:
|
||||
- Keep forensic reports out of aggregate report statistics and ReportStore rollups.
|
||||
- Expose authenticated forensic upload/list/detail APIs.
|
||||
- Provide dedicated forensic report list/detail views for authentication failure investigation.
|
||||
|
||||
Planned:
|
||||
- Add richer failure investigation workflows.
|
||||
- Add privacy-preserving failure sample analysis with grouped causes, priorities, signals, and recommended actions.
|
||||
|
||||
Exit criteria:
|
||||
- A security analyst can inspect individual failure reports without mixing them into aggregate statistics.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user