test: add DMARC compatibility fixture pack
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ import zipfile
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
from app.services.dmarc_parser import DMARCParser
|
||||
from app.tests.test_data import SAMPLE_XML, SAMPLE_XML_WITH_NAMESPACE
|
||||
from app.tests.test_data import SAMPLE_XML, SAMPLE_XML_WITH_NAMESPACE, load_dmarc_fixture
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDMARCParser:
|
||||
@@ -132,80 +132,14 @@ class TestDMARCParser:
|
||||
|
||||
def test_parse_rfc9990_style_report_variant(self):
|
||||
"""RFC 9990-era namespaces and optional fields should parse without breaking legacy shape."""
|
||||
xml = b"""
|
||||
<feedback xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dmarc-2.0"
|
||||
xmlns:vendor="https://reports.example.test/dmarc">
|
||||
<version>1.0</version>
|
||||
<report_metadata>
|
||||
<org_name>Example Receiver</org_name>
|
||||
<email>dmarc@example.test</email>
|
||||
<extra_contact_info>https://example.test/dmarc</extra_contact_info>
|
||||
<report_id>2026-05-23-example.org</report_id>
|
||||
<date_range>
|
||||
<begin>1779494400</begin>
|
||||
<end>1779580799</end>
|
||||
</date_range>
|
||||
<error>Multiple DMARC records were ignored before treewalk.</error>
|
||||
<generator>ExampleRUA 2.0</generator>
|
||||
</report_metadata>
|
||||
<policy_published>
|
||||
<domain>example.org</domain>
|
||||
<discovery_method>treewalk</discovery_method>
|
||||
<p>quarantine</p>
|
||||
<sp>reject</sp>
|
||||
<np>none</np>
|
||||
<fo>1</fo>
|
||||
<adkim>s</adkim>
|
||||
<aspf>r</aspf>
|
||||
<testing>y</testing>
|
||||
</policy_published>
|
||||
<extension>
|
||||
<vendor:receiver>mx1.example.test</vendor:receiver>
|
||||
</extension>
|
||||
<record>
|
||||
<row>
|
||||
<source_ip>2001:db8::1</source_ip>
|
||||
<count>5</count>
|
||||
<policy_evaluated>
|
||||
<disposition>quarantine</disposition>
|
||||
<dkim>fail</dkim>
|
||||
<spf>pass</spf>
|
||||
<reason>
|
||||
<type>local_policy</type>
|
||||
<comment>trusted relay</comment>
|
||||
</reason>
|
||||
</policy_evaluated>
|
||||
</row>
|
||||
<identifiers>
|
||||
<header_from>news.example.org</header_from>
|
||||
<envelope_from>bounce.example.org</envelope_from>
|
||||
<envelope_to>customer.example.net</envelope_to>
|
||||
</identifiers>
|
||||
<auth_results>
|
||||
<dkim>
|
||||
<domain>example.net</domain>
|
||||
<selector>selector1</selector>
|
||||
<result>fail</result>
|
||||
<human_result>body hash did not verify</human_result>
|
||||
</dkim>
|
||||
<spf>
|
||||
<domain>bounce.example.org</domain>
|
||||
<scope>mfrom</scope>
|
||||
<result>pass</result>
|
||||
<human_result>sender authorized</human_result>
|
||||
</spf>
|
||||
</auth_results>
|
||||
<vendor:source>mail-platform</vendor:source>
|
||||
</record>
|
||||
</feedback>
|
||||
"""
|
||||
xml = load_dmarc_fixture("rfc9990-treewalk-extension.xml").encode("utf-8")
|
||||
|
||||
result = DMARCParser.parse_file(xml, "report.xml")
|
||||
|
||||
assert result["variant"] == "rfc9990"
|
||||
assert result["schema_version"] == "1.0"
|
||||
assert result["xml_namespace"] == "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dmarc-2.0"
|
||||
assert result["report_id"] == "2026-05-23-example.org"
|
||||
assert result["report_id"] == "fixture-rfc9990-treewalk"
|
||||
assert result["generator"] == "ExampleRUA 2.0"
|
||||
assert result["errors"] == ["Multiple DMARC records were ignored before treewalk."]
|
||||
assert result["extensions"] == {"receiver": "mx1.example.test"}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user