Move docs from root to docs/ directory, create CHANGELOG.md and TODO.md

Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/christianlouis/dmarq/sessions/00a0c62f-f046-4f73-9c6a-79073906264c

Co-authored-by: christianlouis <361235+christianlouis@users.noreply.github.com>

docs/development/agents.md

@@ -0,0 +1,500 @@
+# Agentic Coding Guidelines for DMARQ
+
+This document provides guidelines for using AI-powered coding assistants (agents) when contributing to DMARQ. Whether you're using GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, or other AI coding tools, these guidelines will help you use them effectively and safely.
+
+## Table of Contents
+
+- [What is Agentic Coding?](#what-is-agentic-coding)
+- [Why DMARQ is Agent-Friendly](#why-dmarq-is-agent-friendly)
+- [Getting Started with AI Assistants](#getting-started-with-ai-assistants)
+- [Best Practices](#best-practices)
+- [Security Considerations](#security-considerations)
+- [Effective Prompts](#effective-prompts)
+- [Review and Validation](#review-and-validation)
+- [Common Pitfalls](#common-pitfalls)
+
+## What is Agentic Coding?
+
+Agentic coding refers to software development where AI assistants (agents) help generate, modify, and review code. These tools can:
+
+- Generate boilerplate code
+- Suggest implementations based on comments
+- Write tests automatically
+- Refactor existing code
+- Find and fix bugs
+- Generate documentation
+
+## Why DMARQ is Agent-Friendly
+
+DMARQ is designed with characteristics that make it work well with AI coding assistants:
+
+### 1. Clear Architecture
+- Modular structure with separation of concerns
+- Consistent patterns across the codebase
+- Well-defined layers (API, Services, Models)
+
+### 2. Comprehensive Documentation
+- Inline code comments
+- API documentation
+- Architecture documentation (see `/docs`)
+- Clear README with examples
+
+### 3. Type Hints
+```python
+def process_report(domain: str, xml_content: str) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
+    """Process a DMARC report with type-safe parameters"""
+    pass
+```
+
+### 4. Test Infrastructure
+- Existing test patterns to follow
+- Clear test organization
+- Example tests for reference
+
+### 5. Consistent Coding Style
+- PEP 8 compliance
+- Automated formatting with Black
+- Clear naming conventions
+
+## Getting Started with AI Assistants
+
+### Setting Up Context
+
+Give your AI assistant context about DMARQ:
+
+```markdown
+DMARQ is a self-hosted DMARC monitoring platform built with:
+- Backend: FastAPI (Python 3.10+)
+- Database: SQLAlchemy ORM (PostgreSQL/SQLite)
+- Templates: Jinja2 with Tailwind CSS
+- Architecture: RESTful API with server-side rendering
+
+Key directories:
+- /backend/app/api - API endpoints
+- /backend/app/services - Business logic
+- /backend/app/models - Database models
+- /backend/app/tests - Test files
+- /docs - Documentation
+```
+
+### Provide Examples
+
+Show the AI assistant examples from the codebase:
+
+```python
+# Example: "Create a new endpoint following this pattern"
+@router.get("/domains", response_model=List[DomainResponse])
+async def list_domains():
+    """List all monitored domains"""
+    store = ReportStore.get_instance()
+    domains = store.get_domains()
+    return domains
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+### 1. Start Small
+
+Begin with small, well-defined tasks:
+
+✅ **Good**: "Add input validation for the domain parameter"
+❌ **Too Broad**: "Rewrite the entire API layer"
+
+### 2. Iterative Development
+
+Work in iterations:
+
+```
+1. Generate initial implementation
+2. Review and test
+3. Refine based on results
+4. Repeat until complete
+```
+
+### 3. Use AI for Appropriate Tasks
+
+| Good Use Cases | Proceed with Caution |
+|----------------|---------------------|
+| Boilerplate code | Security-critical code |
+| Test generation | Authentication logic |
+| Data models | Cryptography |
+| Documentation | Complex algorithms |
+| Refactoring | Database migrations |
+| Bug fixes | Configuration changes |
+
+### 4. Provide Clear Specifications
+
+Be specific in your prompts:
+
+```markdown
+# Good Prompt
+Create a new API endpoint `/api/v1/reports/{report_id}` that:
+- Returns a single DMARC report by ID
+- Uses the existing ReportStore service
+- Includes error handling for not-found cases
+- Follows the existing endpoint patterns
+- Returns a 404 if report doesn't exist
+```
+
+### 5. Review Generated Code
+
+**Always** review AI-generated code for:
+
+- Correctness
+- Security vulnerabilities
+- Performance implications
+- Adherence to project standards
+- Test coverage
+
+## Security Considerations
+
+### Critical: Security Review Required
+
+When AI generates code involving:
+
+- **Authentication/Authorization**: Review thoroughly
+- **Input Validation**: Verify all edge cases
+- **Database Queries**: Check for SQL injection risks
+- **File Operations**: Validate paths and permissions
+- **External APIs**: Review credential handling
+- **Cryptography**: Verify algorithm choices
+
+### Security Checklist for AI-Generated Code
+
+```markdown
+- [ ] No hardcoded secrets or credentials
+- [ ] All user inputs are validated
+- [ ] SQL queries use ORM (no raw SQL)
+- [ ] Files are handled securely
+- [ ] Error messages don't leak sensitive data
+- [ ] Authentication is properly implemented
+- [ ] Authorization checks are present
+- [ ] HTTPS is enforced where applicable
+- [ ] Dependencies are secure versions
+```
+
+### Example: Reviewing AI-Generated Auth Code
+
+```python
+# ❌ AI might generate this - INSECURE
+@router.post("/admin/action")
+async def admin_action():
+    # Missing authentication check!
+    return perform_admin_action()
+
+# ✅ Fixed by human review
+@router.post("/admin/action")
+async def admin_action(
+    current_user: User = Depends(get_current_active_user)
+):
+    if not current_user.is_admin:
+        raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Admin access required")
+    return perform_admin_action()
+```
+
+## Effective Prompts
+
+### Prompt Templates
+
+#### 1. Creating New Features
+
+```
+Create a new [feature] that:
+- Purpose: [description]
+- Location: [file/directory]
+- Dependencies: [services, models]
+- Follow patterns from: [example file]
+- Include: [tests, docs, validation]
+- Error handling: [specific requirements]
+```
+
+#### 2. Fixing Bugs
+
+```
+Fix the bug in [file] where [description]:
+- Current behavior: [what happens now]
+- Expected behavior: [what should happen]
+- Error message: [if any]
+- Reproduce: [steps]
+- Maintain: [backward compatibility]
+```
+
+#### 3. Refactoring
+
+```
+Refactor [module/function] to [goal]:
+- Current issues: [problems]
+- Keep: [what must stay the same]
+- Improve: [specific aspects]
+- Don't break: [tests, APIs]
+- Performance: [requirements]
+```
+
+#### 4. Adding Tests
+
+```
+Write tests for [function/module]:
+- Test file: [location]
+- Follow pattern: [existing test]
+- Cover cases: [list scenarios]
+- Use fixtures: [if applicable]
+- Mock: [external dependencies]
+```
+
+### Real Examples for DMARQ
+
+```markdown
+# Example 1: New Endpoint
+Create a GET endpoint /api/v1/domains/{domain}/stats that returns
+DMARC statistics for a specific domain. Use the existing DomainResponse 
+model and ReportStore.get_domain_summary() method. Include error 
+handling for invalid domain names.
+
+# Example 2: Input Validation
+Add input validation to the domain parameter in the reports upload
+endpoint. Domain should match pattern: ^[a-z0-9.-]+$ and be max 
+255 characters. Return 400 error with clear message if invalid.
+
+# Example 3: Test Creation
+Write pytest tests for the DMARC parser handling compressed files.
+Test cases: valid .zip, valid .gz, corrupted archive, empty archive,
+archive with multiple files. Place in test_dmarc_parser.py.
+
+# Example 4: Documentation
+Generate API documentation for all endpoints in 
+/api/v1/endpoints/domains.py following OpenAPI/Swagger format.
+Include request/response examples and error codes.
+```
+
+## Review and Validation
+
+### Human Review Process
+
+1. **Read the Code**: Don't just trust, understand it
+2. **Test Locally**: Run the code in your environment
+3. **Check Tests**: Verify tests are meaningful
+4. **Security Scan**: Run security tools (bandit, safety)
+5. **Performance**: Consider efficiency implications
+6. **Documentation**: Ensure docs are updated
+
+### Testing AI-Generated Code
+
+```bash
+# Run unit tests
+pytest backend/app/tests/
+
+# Check code coverage
+pytest --cov=app --cov-report=html
+
+# Lint the code
+pylint backend/app/
+black --check backend/app/
+
+# Security scan
+bandit -r backend/app/
+safety check
+
+# Type checking
+mypy backend/app/
+```
+
+### Code Review Questions
+
+Ask yourself:
+
+1. **Does it work?** Test thoroughly
+2. **Is it secure?** Check for vulnerabilities
+3. **Is it maintainable?** Can others understand it?
+4. **Does it fit?** Follows project patterns?
+5. **Is it tested?** Has adequate test coverage?
+6. **Is it documented?** Clear comments and docs?
+
+## Common Pitfalls
+
+### Pitfall 1: Over-Trusting AI
+
+❌ **Don't**: Accept AI code without review
+✅ **Do**: Treat AI suggestions as drafts requiring validation
+
+### Pitfall 2: Insufficient Context
+
+❌ **Don't**: Give vague prompts
+✅ **Do**: Provide specific requirements and examples
+
+### Pitfall 3: Ignoring Project Standards
+
+❌ **Don't**: Let AI deviate from project conventions
+✅ **Do**: Explicitly mention standards in prompts
+
+### Pitfall 4: Security Blind Spots
+
+❌ **Don't**: Assume AI handles security correctly
+✅ **Do**: Always perform security review
+
+### Pitfall 5: Missing Tests
+
+❌ **Don't**: Ship AI code without tests
+✅ **Do**: Generate tests for all new code
+
+### Pitfall 6: Documentation Lag
+
+❌ **Don't**: Forget to update documentation
+✅ **Do**: Update docs alongside code changes
+
+## Advanced Techniques
+
+### 1. Multi-Step Prompting
+
+Break complex tasks into steps:
+
+```markdown
+Step 1: "Create the data model for forensic reports"
+Step 2: "Add database migration for the new model"
+Step 3: "Create service methods to process forensic reports"
+Step 4: "Add API endpoint to retrieve forensic reports"
+Step 5: "Write tests for the entire flow"
+```
+
+### 2. Using Examples
+
+Provide examples to guide the AI:
+
+```python
+# "Create a similar endpoint for forensic reports"
+# Example to follow:
+@router.get("/aggregate-reports/{report_id}")
+async def get_aggregate_report(report_id: str):
+    store = ReportStore.get_instance()
+    report = store.get_report(report_id)
+    if not report:
+        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Report not found")
+    return report
+```
+
+### 3. Constraint-Based Generation
+
+Set clear boundaries:
+
+```markdown
+Create a caching layer for domain statistics:
+- Must not cache for more than 5 minutes
+- Must handle cache invalidation on new reports
+- Must be thread-safe
+- Must use Redis if available, fallback to in-memory
+- Must include cache hit/miss metrics
+```
+
+### 4. Validation Prompts
+
+Ask AI to review its own work:
+
+```markdown
+Review the above code for:
+1. Security vulnerabilities
+2. Performance bottlenecks
+3. Error handling completeness
+4. Test coverage gaps
+5. Documentation clarity
+```
+
+## Integration with Development Workflow
+
+### Git Workflow
+
+```bash
+# 1. Create branch
+git checkout -b feature/ai-assisted-forensic-reports
+
+# 2. Use AI to generate code
+# ... work with AI assistant ...
+
+# 3. Review and test
+pytest
+bandit -r backend/app/
+
+# 4. Commit with clear message
+git commit -m "feat: add forensic report support
+
+Generated initial implementation with AI assistance.
+Manually reviewed for security and correctness.
+Added additional test cases and error handling."
+
+# 5. Create PR with context
+# Mention AI assistance in PR description
+```
+
+### PR Description Template
+
+```markdown
+## Description
+[What was changed]
+
+## AI Assistance
+- Tool used: GitHub Copilot / Cursor / Claude
+- Tasks assisted: [code generation, tests, docs]
+- Human review: [what you validated]
+
+## Testing
+[How you tested the AI-generated code]
+
+## Security Review
+- [ ] No hardcoded secrets
+- [ ] Input validation present
+- [ ] Authentication/authorization correct
+- [ ] No SQL injection risks
+- [ ] Error handling appropriate
+```
+
+## Resources
+
+### AI Coding Tools
+
+- **GitHub Copilot**: https://github.com/features/copilot
+- **Cursor**: https://cursor.sh/
+- **Tabnine**: https://www.tabnine.com/
+- **Amazon CodeWhisperer**: https://aws.amazon.com/codewhisperer/
+
+### Security Tools
+
+```bash
+# Install security scanning tools
+pip install bandit safety detect-secrets
+
+# Run scans
+bandit -r backend/app/
+safety check
+detect-secrets scan
+```
+
+### Learning Resources
+
+- [GitHub Copilot Best Practices](https://github.blog/2023-06-20-how-to-write-better-prompts-for-github-copilot/)
+- [AI-Assisted Coding Security Guide](https://owasp.org/www-project-ai-security-and-privacy-guide/)
+- [DMARQ Contributing Guide](CONTRIBUTING.md)
+- [DMARQ Security Policy](SECURITY.md)
+
+## Questions and Support
+
+If you have questions about using AI assistants with DMARQ:
+
+1. Check this guide first
+2. Review existing AI-assisted PRs for examples
+3. Ask in GitHub Discussions
+4. Mention in your PR if you need guidance
+
+## Conclusion
+
+AI coding assistants are powerful tools that can accelerate development when used properly. The key principles:
+
+1. **AI assists, humans decide**: You're responsible for the code
+2. **Security first**: Always review for vulnerabilities
+3. **Test everything**: Don't trust, verify
+4. **Document clearly**: Note when AI was used
+5. **Follow standards**: Maintain project consistency
+
+Happy coding with your AI assistant! 🤖✨
+
+---
+
+**Document Version**: 1.0  
+**Last Updated**: 2026-02-06

docs/development/generated_issues/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+# DMARQ Roadmap Issues
+
+This directory contains auto-generated GitHub issues parsed from the DMARQ roadmap documents.
+
+## 📊 Summary
+
+**Total Issues Generated**: 54
+
+### Breakdown by Category
+
+- **Security Remediation Sprint**: 7 issues (CRITICAL/HIGH priority)
+- **Milestone Features**: 43 issues (distributed across milestones 4-11)
+- **Continuous Improvements**: 4 issues (ongoing maintenance)
+
+## 📁 Files
+
+### 1. `issues.json`
+JSON-formatted issue data suitable for programmatic import or custom processing.
+
+**Structure**:
+```json
+[
+  {
+    "title": "Issue title",
+    "body": "Issue description in markdown",
+    "labels": ["label1", "label2"],
+    "milestone": "Milestone name",
+    "assignees": []
+  }
+]
+```
+
+### 2. `issues_preview.md`
+Human-readable preview of all issues, organized by milestone. Review this file to see what issues will be created.
+
+### 3. `create_issues.sh`
+Executable bash script that uses GitHub CLI to create all issues automatically.
+
+## 🚀 How to Create Issues
+
+### Option 1: Using GitHub CLI (Recommended)
+
+**Prerequisites**:
+- Install [GitHub CLI](https://cli.github.com/)
+- Authenticate: `gh auth login`
+
+**Steps**:
+```bash
+cd generated_issues
+./create_issues.sh
+```
+
+The script will:
+- Check if GitHub CLI is installed and authenticated
+- Create all 54 issues in the `christianlouis/dmarq` repository
+- Apply appropriate labels to each issue
+- Add rate limiting (1 second between issues) to avoid API throttling
+
+**Note**: The script does NOT create milestones automatically. See section below.
+
+### Option 2: Manual Creation
+
+Review `issues_preview.md` and manually create issues through the GitHub web interface.
+
+### Option 3: Custom Import
+
+Use `issues.json` with your own tooling or GitHub API integration.
+
+## 🏷️ Milestones
+
+The following milestones are referenced in the issues. You may want to create these in GitHub before running the import script:
+
+1. **Security Remediation Sprint** (7 issues) - 🔴 PRIORITY
+2. **Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization** (6 issues)
+3. **Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support** (6 issues)
+4. **Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications** (5 issues)
+5. **Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine** (5 issues)
+6. **Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration** (5 issues)
+7. **Milestone 9: Forensic Reports (RUF) Support** (5 issues)
+8. **Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting** (5 issues)
+9. **Milestone 11: Enterprise Features** (6 issues)
+10. **Continuous Improvements** (4 issues)
+
+**To create milestones using GitHub CLI**:
+```bash
+gh milestone create "Security Remediation Sprint" --repo christianlouis/dmarq
+gh milestone create "Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization" --repo christianlouis/dmarq
+# ... etc
+```
+
+Or create them through the GitHub web interface: https://github.com/christianlouis/dmarq/milestones
+
+## 🏷️ Labels
+
+The issues use the following labels (you may need to create some):
+
+### Priority Labels
+- `priority: critical` - Must be addressed immediately
+- `priority: high` - Important, should be addressed soon
+- `priority: medium` - Normal priority
+- `priority: low` - Can be deferred
+
+### Type Labels
+- `security` - Security-related issues
+- `security: critical` - Critical security vulnerabilities
+- `security: high` - High-severity security issues
+- `enhancement` - New features or improvements
+- `maintenance` - Ongoing maintenance tasks
+- `continuous-improvement` - Part of continuous improvement process
+- `documentation` - Documentation updates
+- `code-quality` - Code quality improvements
+
+### Milestone Labels
+- `milestone-4` through `milestone-11` - Associate with specific milestones
+
+## 📋 Issue Organization
+
+### Security Sprint (Start Here!)
+The Security Remediation Sprint contains 7 critical security issues that should be addressed **first**:
+
+1. Authentication & Authorization (CRITICAL)
+2. Secret Management (CRITICAL)
+3. XML Parsing Security (HIGH)
+4. Input Validation (HIGH)
+5. Security Headers (MEDIUM)
+6. CORS Configuration (MEDIUM)
+7. Error Handling (MEDIUM)
+
+### Milestone Features
+Features are organized by milestone (4-11), with Milestone 4 being the next to implement after security fixes.
+
+### Continuous Improvements
+Four ongoing improvement categories:
+- Code Quality
+- Security
+- Documentation
+- Community
+
+## 🔄 Regenerating Issues
+
+If you need to regenerate issues after modifying the roadmap:
+
+```bash
+cd /home/runner/work/dmarq/dmarq
+python3 scripts/generate_issues.py
+```
+
+This will overwrite the files in this directory.
+
+## ⚙️ Customization
+
+### Modifying the Generator
+
+Edit `/home/runner/work/dmarq/dmarq/scripts/generate_issues.py` to customize:
+- Issue title formats
+- Body templates
+- Label assignments
+- Milestone mappings
+
+### Filtering Issues
+
+To create only specific issues:
+
+**Security issues only**:
+```bash
+jq '.[] | select(.labels[] | contains("security"))' issues.json
+```
+
+**Specific milestone**:
+```bash
+jq '.[] | select(.milestone == "Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization")' issues.json
+```
+
+**High priority only**:
+```bash
+jq '.[] | select(.labels[] | contains("priority: high"))' issues.json
+```
+
+## 🎯 Recommended Workflow
+
+1. **Review**: Read through `issues_preview.md` to understand all issues
+2. **Create Milestones**: Set up milestones in GitHub
+3. **Create Labels**: Ensure all required labels exist
+4. **Import Security Issues First**: Consider importing just the Security Sprint issues first
+5. **Import Remaining Issues**: Create the rest of the issues
+6. **Organize**: Assign issues to milestones and team members
+7. **Prioritize**: Adjust priorities based on your team's capacity
+
+## 📞 Support
+
+- **Source**: Generated from [ROADMAP.md](../ROADMAP.md)
+- **Script**: [scripts/generate_issues.py](../scripts/generate_issues.py)
+- **Questions**: Open an issue in the DMARQ repository
+
+## 🔒 Important Notes
+
+### Security Priority
+The Security Remediation Sprint issues are marked as CRITICAL and HIGH priority. These should be addressed **before** implementing new features to ensure the application is secure.
+
+### Milestone Dependencies
+Some milestones depend on others:
+- Milestone 5 (Authentication) is required before several later features
+- Security Sprint should be completed before Milestone 4
+- See the roadmap for detailed dependency information
+
+### Rate Limiting
+The import script includes rate limiting (1 second between API calls) to avoid GitHub API throttling. Creating all 54 issues will take approximately 1-2 minutes.
+
+---
+
+**Generated**: 2026-02-06  
+**Script Version**: 1.0  
+**Issues Count**: 54

docs/development/generated_issues/issues.json

@@ -0,0 +1,592 @@
+[
+  {
+    "title": "[Security Sprint] Authentication & Authorization",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nPart of the **Security Remediation Sprint** - Priority: **CRITICAL**\n\n### Tasks\n\n- [ ] Add authentication middleware to all admin endpoints\n- [ ] Implement proper user authentication system\n- [ ] Add authorization checks on sensitive operations\n- [ ] Add rate limiting to prevent abuse\n\n### Files to Update\n\n- `backend/app/main.py`\n- `backend/app/api/api_v1/endpoints/imap.py`\n- `backend/app/api/api_v1/endpoints/domains.py`\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [SECURITY.md](../SECURITY.md)\n- [Security Remediation Sprint](../ROADMAP.md#security-remediation-sprint-priority---in-progress)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "security",
+      "priority: critical",
+      "security: critical"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Security Remediation Sprint",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[Security Sprint] Secret Management",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nPart of the **Security Remediation Sprint** - Priority: **CRITICAL**\n\n### Tasks\n\n- [ ] Remove default SECRET_KEY value\n- [ ] Add SECRET_KEY validation on startup\n- [ ] Document secret generation in deployment guide\n- [ ] Add warning if default secret is detected\n\n### Files to Update\n\n- `backend/app/core/config.py`\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [SECURITY.md](../SECURITY.md)\n- [Security Remediation Sprint](../ROADMAP.md#security-remediation-sprint-priority---in-progress)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "security",
+      "priority: critical",
+      "security: critical"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Security Remediation Sprint",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[Security Sprint] XML Parsing Security",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nPart of the **Security Remediation Sprint** - Priority: **HIGH**\n\n### Tasks\n\n- [ ] Replace ElementTree with defusedxml\n- [ ] Add file size limits for uploads\n- [ ] Implement zip bomb protection\n- [ ] Add malware scanning hooks (optional)\n\n### Files to Update\n\n- `backend/app/services/dmarc_parser.py`\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [SECURITY.md](../SECURITY.md)\n- [Security Remediation Sprint](../ROADMAP.md#security-remediation-sprint-priority---in-progress)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "security",
+      "priority: high",
+      "security: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Security Remediation Sprint",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[Security Sprint] Input Validation",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nPart of the **Security Remediation Sprint** - Priority: **HIGH**\n\n### Tasks\n\n- [ ] Add domain name validation regex\n- [ ] Implement file type validation (MIME + extension)\n- [ ] Add parameter validation on all endpoints\n- [ ] Sanitize error messages\n\n### Files to Update\n\n- `backend/app/api/api_v1/endpoints/domains.py`\n- `backend/app/api/api_v1/endpoints/reports.py`\n- `backend/app/utils/domain_validator.py`\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [SECURITY.md](../SECURITY.md)\n- [Security Remediation Sprint](../ROADMAP.md#security-remediation-sprint-priority---in-progress)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "security",
+      "priority: high",
+      "security: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Security Remediation Sprint",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[Security Sprint] Security Headers",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nPart of the **Security Remediation Sprint** - Priority: **MEDIUM**\n\n### Tasks\n\n- [ ] Add security headers middleware\n- [ ] Implement CSP (Content Security Policy)\n- [ ] Add X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options\n- [ ] Configure HSTS for production\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [SECURITY.md](../SECURITY.md)\n- [Security Remediation Sprint](../ROADMAP.md#security-remediation-sprint-priority---in-progress)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "security",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Security Remediation Sprint",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[Security Sprint] CORS Configuration",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nPart of the **Security Remediation Sprint** - Priority: **MEDIUM**\n\n### Tasks\n\n- [ ] Restrict CORS methods and headers\n- [ ] Remove wildcard configurations\n- [ ] Document CORS setup for deployments\n\n### Files to Update\n\n- `backend/app/main.py`\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [SECURITY.md](../SECURITY.md)\n- [Security Remediation Sprint](../ROADMAP.md#security-remediation-sprint-priority---in-progress)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "security",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Security Remediation Sprint",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[Security Sprint] Error Handling",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nPart of the **Security Remediation Sprint** - Priority: **MEDIUM**\n\n### Tasks\n\n- [ ] Implement centralized error handling\n- [ ] Remove sensitive data from error responses\n- [ ] Add error logging with request context\n- [ ] Create user-friendly error messages\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [SECURITY.md](../SECURITY.md)\n- [Security Remediation Sprint](../ROADMAP.md#security-remediation-sprint-priority---in-progress)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "security",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Security Remediation Sprint",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M4] Historical trend charts (Chart.js integration)",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization**\n\n**Timeline**: Next - 4-6 weeks\n\n### Feature\nHistorical trend charts (Chart.js integration)\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 4](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-4-enhanced-dashboard--visualization)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-4",
+      "priority: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M4] Compliance rate visualizations",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization**\n\n**Timeline**: Next - 4-6 weeks\n\n### Feature\nCompliance rate visualizations\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 4](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-4-enhanced-dashboard--visualization)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-4",
+      "priority: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M4] Volume and sender analytics",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization**\n\n**Timeline**: Next - 4-6 weeks\n\n### Feature\nVolume and sender analytics\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 4](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-4-enhanced-dashboard--visualization)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-4",
+      "priority: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M4] Time-series data displays",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization**\n\n**Timeline**: Next - 4-6 weeks\n\n### Feature\nTime-series data displays\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 4](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-4-enhanced-dashboard--visualization)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-4",
+      "priority: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M4] Domain comparison views",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization**\n\n**Timeline**: Next - 4-6 weeks\n\n### Feature\nDomain comparison views\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 4](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-4-enhanced-dashboard--visualization)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-4",
+      "priority: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M5] FastAPI Users integration",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support**\n\n**Timeline**: 8-10 weeks\n\n### Feature\nFastAPI Users integration\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 5](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-5-user-authentication--multi-user-support)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-5",
+      "priority: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M5] User registration and management",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support**\n\n**Timeline**: 8-10 weeks\n\n### Feature\nUser registration and management\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 5](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-5-user-authentication--multi-user-support)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-5",
+      "priority: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M5] JWT-based authentication",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support**\n\n**Timeline**: 8-10 weeks\n\n### Feature\nJWT-based authentication\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 5](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-5-user-authentication--multi-user-support)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-5",
+      "priority: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M5] Role-based access control (RBAC)",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support**\n\n**Timeline**: 8-10 weeks\n\n### Feature\nRole-based access control (RBAC)\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 5](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-5-user-authentication--multi-user-support)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-5",
+      "priority: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M5] Password reset functionality",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support**\n\n**Timeline**: 8-10 weeks\n\n### Feature\nPassword reset functionality\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 5](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-5-user-authentication--multi-user-support)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-5",
+      "priority: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M5] Email verification (optional)",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support**\n\n**Timeline**: 8-10 weeks\n\n### Feature\nEmail verification (optional)\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 5](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-5-user-authentication--multi-user-support)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-5",
+      "priority: high"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M6] Apprise integration",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications**\n\n**Timeline**: 10-12 weeks\n\n### Feature\nApprise integration\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 6](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-6-alerting--notifications)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-6",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M6] Customizable alert rules",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications**\n\n**Timeline**: 10-12 weeks\n\n### Feature\nCustomizable alert rules\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 6](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-6-alerting--notifications)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-6",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M6] Multi-channel notifications (Email, Slack, etc.)",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications**\n\n**Timeline**: 10-12 weeks\n\n### Feature\nMulti-channel notifications (Email, Slack, etc.)\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 6](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-6-alerting--notifications)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-6",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M6] Alert history and management",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications**\n\n**Timeline**: 10-12 weeks\n\n### Feature\nAlert history and management\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 6](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-6-alerting--notifications)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-6",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M6] Notification preferences per user",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications**\n\n**Timeline**: 10-12 weeks\n\n### Feature\nNotification preferences per user\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 6](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-6-alerting--notifications)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-6",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M7] Custom alert conditions",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine**\n\n**Timeline**: 14-16 weeks\n\n### Feature\nCustom alert conditions\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 7](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-7-advanced-rule-engine)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-7",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M7] Threshold-based triggers",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine**\n\n**Timeline**: 14-16 weeks\n\n### Feature\nThreshold-based triggers\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 7](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-7-advanced-rule-engine)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-7",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M7] New sender detection",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine**\n\n**Timeline**: 14-16 weeks\n\n### Feature\nNew sender detection\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 7](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-7-advanced-rule-engine)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-7",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M7] Anomaly detection",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine**\n\n**Timeline**: 14-16 weeks\n\n### Feature\nAnomaly detection\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 7](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-7-advanced-rule-engine)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-7",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M7] Scheduled report summaries",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine**\n\n**Timeline**: 14-16 weeks\n\n### Feature\nScheduled report summaries\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 7](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-7-advanced-rule-engine)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-7",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M8] DNS record health checks",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration**\n\n**Timeline**: 16-18 weeks\n\n### Feature\nDNS record health checks\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 8](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-8-dns-health--cloudflare-integration)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-8",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M8] SPF/DKIM/DMARC validation",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration**\n\n**Timeline**: 16-18 weeks\n\n### Feature\nSPF/DKIM/DMARC validation\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 8](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-8-dns-health--cloudflare-integration)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-8",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M8] Cloudflare API integration",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration**\n\n**Timeline**: 16-18 weeks\n\n### Feature\nCloudflare API integration\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 8](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-8-dns-health--cloudflare-integration)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-8",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M8] Configuration recommendations",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration**\n\n**Timeline**: 16-18 weeks\n\n### Feature\nConfiguration recommendations\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 8](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-8-dns-health--cloudflare-integration)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-8",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M8] DNS change tracking",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration**\n\n**Timeline**: 16-18 weeks\n\n### Feature\nDNS change tracking\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 8](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-8-dns-health--cloudflare-integration)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-8",
+      "priority: medium"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M9] Forensic report parsing",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 9: Forensic Reports**\n\n**Timeline**: RUF) Support (20-22 weeks\n\n### Feature\nForensic report parsing\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 9](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-9-forensic-reports)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-9",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 9: Forensic Reports",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M9] Failure sample analysis",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 9: Forensic Reports**\n\n**Timeline**: RUF) Support (20-22 weeks\n\n### Feature\nFailure sample analysis\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 9](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-9-forensic-reports)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-9",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 9: Forensic Reports",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M9] PII redaction options",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 9: Forensic Reports**\n\n**Timeline**: RUF) Support (20-22 weeks\n\n### Feature\nPII redaction options\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 9](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-9-forensic-reports)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-9",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 9: Forensic Reports",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M9] Detailed authentication failure views",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 9: Forensic Reports**\n\n**Timeline**: RUF) Support (20-22 weeks\n\n### Feature\nDetailed authentication failure views\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 9](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-9-forensic-reports)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-9",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 9: Forensic Reports",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M9] Sample download/export",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 9: Forensic Reports**\n\n**Timeline**: RUF) Support (20-22 weeks\n\n### Feature\nSample download/export\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 9](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-9-forensic-reports)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-9",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 9: Forensic Reports",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M10] Historical trend analysis",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting**\n\n**Timeline**: 24-26 weeks\n\n### Feature\nHistorical trend analysis\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 10](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-10-advanced-analytics--reporting)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-10",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M10] Comparative reporting",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting**\n\n**Timeline**: 24-26 weeks\n\n### Feature\nComparative reporting\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 10](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-10-advanced-analytics--reporting)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-10",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M10] Export capabilities (PDF, CSV)",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting**\n\n**Timeline**: 24-26 weeks\n\n### Feature\nExport capabilities (PDF, CSV)\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 10](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-10-advanced-analytics--reporting)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-10",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M10] Scheduled reports",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting**\n\n**Timeline**: 24-26 weeks\n\n### Feature\nScheduled reports\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 10](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-10-advanced-analytics--reporting)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-10",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M10] Custom dashboards",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting**\n\n**Timeline**: 24-26 weeks\n\n### Feature\nCustom dashboards\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 10](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-10-advanced-analytics--reporting)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-10",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M11] Multi-tenant architecture",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 11: Enterprise Features**\n\n**Timeline**: 28-30+ weeks\n\n### Feature\nMulti-tenant architecture\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 11](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-11-enterprise-features)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-11",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 11: Enterprise Features",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M11] API rate limiting",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 11: Enterprise Features**\n\n**Timeline**: 28-30+ weeks\n\n### Feature\nAPI rate limiting\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 11](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-11-enterprise-features)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-11",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 11: Enterprise Features",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M11] Advanced RBAC",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 11: Enterprise Features**\n\n**Timeline**: 28-30+ weeks\n\n### Feature\nAdvanced RBAC\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 11](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-11-enterprise-features)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-11",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 11: Enterprise Features",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M11] SSO integration (SAML, OAuth)",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 11: Enterprise Features**\n\n**Timeline**: 28-30+ weeks\n\n### Feature\nSSO integration (SAML, OAuth)\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 11](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-11-enterprise-features)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-11",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 11: Enterprise Features",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M11] Compliance reporting (SOC 2, GDPR)",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 11: Enterprise Features**\n\n**Timeline**: 28-30+ weeks\n\n### Feature\nCompliance reporting (SOC 2, GDPR)\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 11](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-11-enterprise-features)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-11",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 11: Enterprise Features",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M11] High availability setup",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 11: Enterprise Features**\n\n**Timeline**: 28-30+ weeks\n\n### Feature\nHigh availability setup\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 11](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-11-enterprise-features)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-11",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 11: Enterprise Features",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[M11] Backup and disaster recovery",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nFeature for **Milestone 11: Enterprise Features**\n\n**Timeline**: 28-30+ weeks\n\n### Feature\nBackup and disaster recovery\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Milestone 11](../ROADMAP.md#milestone-11-enterprise-features)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "enhancement",
+      "milestone-11",
+      "priority: low"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Milestone 11: Enterprise Features",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[Continuous] Code Quality Improvements",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nOngoing code quality tasks to maintain and improve DMARQ.\n\n### Tasks\n\n- [ ] Maintain >80% test coverage\n- [ ] Regular dependency updates\n- [ ] Code review for all changes\n- [ ] Performance optimization\n- [ ] Technical debt reduction\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Continuous Improvements](../ROADMAP.md#continuous-improvements-ongoing)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "maintenance",
+      "continuous-improvement",
+      "code-quality"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Continuous Improvements",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[Continuous] Security Improvements",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nOngoing security tasks to maintain and improve DMARQ.\n\n### Tasks\n\n- [ ] Monthly security audits\n- [ ] Automated vulnerability scanning (GitHub Actions)\n- [ ] Dependency security monitoring\n- [ ] Regular penetration testing\n- [ ] Security training for contributors\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Continuous Improvements](../ROADMAP.md#continuous-improvements-ongoing)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "maintenance",
+      "continuous-improvement",
+      "security"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Continuous Improvements",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[Continuous] Documentation Improvements",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nOngoing documentation tasks to maintain and improve DMARQ.\n\n### Tasks\n\n- [ ] Keep documentation current\n- [ ] API documentation completeness\n- [ ] Security best practices guide\n- [ ] Deployment playbooks\n- [ ] Troubleshooting guides\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Continuous Improvements](../ROADMAP.md#continuous-improvements-ongoing)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "maintenance",
+      "continuous-improvement",
+      "documentation"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Continuous Improvements",
+    "assignees": []
+  },
+  {
+    "title": "[Continuous] Community Improvements",
+    "body": "## Description\n\nOngoing community tasks to maintain and improve DMARQ.\n\n### Tasks\n\n- [ ] Issue triage and response\n- [ ] PR review and merging\n- [ ] Community engagement\n- [ ] Feature request evaluation\n- [ ] Bug fix prioritization\n\n### Related Documentation\n\n- [Continuous Improvements](../ROADMAP.md#continuous-improvements-ongoing)\n\n---\n*This issue was auto-generated from the DMARQ roadmap.*",
+    "labels": [
+      "maintenance",
+      "continuous-improvement"
+    ],
+    "milestone": "Continuous Improvements",
+    "assignees": []
+  }
+]

docs/development/issue_generation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
+# Issue Generation from Roadmap - Summary
+
+## What Was Done
+
+This PR implements a complete solution for generating GitHub issues from the DMARQ roadmap documentation.
+
+### Created Files
+
+1. **`scripts/generate_issues.py`** (410 lines)
+   - Python script that parses ROADMAP.md
+   - Extracts tasks from three main sections:
+     - Security Remediation Sprint
+     - Milestones 4-11
+     - Continuous Improvements
+   - Generates structured issue data in multiple formats
+
+2. **`generated_issues/issues.json`** (32 KB)
+   - JSON file with 54 issues
+   - Includes title, body, labels, milestone, and assignees
+   - Ready for programmatic import via GitHub API
+
+3. **`generated_issues/issues_preview.md`** (25 KB)
+   - Human-readable markdown preview
+   - Organized by milestone
+   - Allows manual review before creating issues
+
+4. **`generated_issues/create_issues.sh`** (39 KB)
+   - Executable bash script
+   - Uses GitHub CLI to create all 54 issues
+   - Includes error handling and rate limiting
+
+5. **`generated_issues/README.md`** (6.5 KB)
+   - Comprehensive documentation
+   - Usage instructions for all three import methods
+   - Label and milestone reference guide
+
+## Issue Breakdown
+
+### Total: 54 Issues
+
+#### Security Remediation Sprint (7 issues - HIGHEST PRIORITY)
+1. **[Security Sprint] Authentication & Authorization** (CRITICAL)
+2. **[Security Sprint] Secret Management** (CRITICAL)
+3. **[Security Sprint] XML Parsing Security** (HIGH)
+4. **[Security Sprint] Input Validation** (HIGH)
+5. **[Security Sprint] Security Headers** (MEDIUM)
+6. **[Security Sprint] CORS Configuration** (MEDIUM)
+7. **[Security Sprint] Error Handling** (MEDIUM)
+
+#### Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization (6 issues)
+- Historical trend charts
+- Compliance rate visualizations
+- Volume and sender analytics
+- Time-series data displays
+- Domain comparison views
+- Security enhancements (XSS prevention, CSP)
+
+#### Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support (6 issues)
+- FastAPI Users integration
+- User registration and management
+- JWT-based authentication
+- Role-based access control (RBAC)
+- Password reset functionality
+- Security features (MFA, session management, etc.)
+
+#### Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications (5 issues)
+- Apprise integration
+- Customizable alert rules
+- Multi-channel notifications
+- Alert history and management
+- Security features
+
+#### Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine (5 issues)
+- Custom alert conditions
+- Threshold-based triggers
+- New sender detection
+- Anomaly detection
+- Security features
+
+#### Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration (5 issues)
+- DNS record health checks
+- SPF/DKIM/DMARC validation
+- Cloudflare API integration
+- Configuration recommendations
+- Security features
+
+#### Milestone 9: Forensic Reports (RUF) Support (5 issues)
+- Forensic report parsing
+- Failure sample analysis
+- PII redaction options
+- Detailed authentication failure views
+- Security features
+
+#### Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting (5 issues)
+- Historical trend analysis
+- Comparative reporting
+- Export capabilities
+- Scheduled reports
+- Security features
+
+#### Milestone 11: Enterprise Features (6 issues)
+- Multi-tenant architecture
+- API rate limiting
+- Advanced RBAC
+- SSO integration
+- Compliance reporting
+- Security features
+
+#### Continuous Improvements (4 issues)
+- **Code Quality**: Test coverage, dependency updates, code review, performance, tech debt
+- **Security**: Monthly audits, vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, training
+- **Documentation**: Keep current, API docs, security guides, playbooks, troubleshooting
+- **Community**: Issue triage, PR review, engagement, feature evaluation, bug fixes
+
+## Labels Used
+
+### Priority
+- `priority: critical` (7 issues)
+- `priority: high` (19 issues)
+- `priority: medium` (21 issues)
+- `priority: low` (7 issues)
+
+### Type
+- `security` (18 issues)
+- `security: critical` (2 issues)
+- `security: high` (2 issues)
+- `enhancement` (43 issues)
+- `maintenance` (4 issues)
+- `continuous-improvement` (4 issues)
+- `documentation` (1 issue)
+- `code-quality` (1 issue)
+
+### Milestones
+- `milestone-4` through `milestone-11`
+
+## How to Create the Issues
+
+### Option 1: Using GitHub CLI (Recommended)
+
+```bash
+# Install GitHub CLI if not already installed
+# See: https://cli.github.com/
+
+# Authenticate
+gh auth login
+
+# Navigate to the generated issues directory
+cd generated_issues
+
+# Run the script
+./create_issues.sh
+```
+
+This will create all 54 issues automatically. The script includes:
+- ✅ Verification that GitHub CLI is installed
+- ✅ Authentication check
+- ✅ Rate limiting (1 second between issues)
+- ✅ Error handling
+- ✅ Progress reporting
+
+### Option 2: Manual Creation
+
+Review `generated_issues/issues_preview.md` and create issues manually through the GitHub web interface.
+
+### Option 3: Custom Import
+
+Use `generated_issues/issues.json` with your own tooling or GitHub API:
+
+```python
+import json
+import requests
+
+with open('issues.json') as f:
+    issues = json.load(f)
+
+for issue in issues:
+    response = requests.post(
+        'https://api.github.com/repos/christianlouis/dmarq/issues',
+        headers={'Authorization': f'token {YOUR_TOKEN}'},
+        json={
+            'title': issue['title'],
+            'body': issue['body'],
+            'labels': issue['labels']
+        }
+    )
+```
+
+## Milestones Setup
+
+Before creating issues, you may want to create milestones:
+
+```bash
+gh milestone create "Security Remediation Sprint" --repo christianlouis/dmarq
+gh milestone create "Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization" --repo christianlouis/dmarq
+gh milestone create "Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support" --repo christianlouis/dmarq
+gh milestone create "Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications" --repo christianlouis/dmarq
+gh milestone create "Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine" --repo christianlouis/dmarq
+gh milestone create "Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration" --repo christianlouis/dmarq
+gh milestone create "Milestone 9: Forensic Reports (RUF) Support" --repo christianlouis/dmarq
+gh milestone create "Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting" --repo christianlouis/dmarq
+gh milestone create "Milestone 11: Enterprise Features" --repo christianlouis/dmarq
+gh milestone create "Continuous Improvements" --repo christianlouis/dmarq
+```
+
+## Recommended Workflow
+
+1. **Review**: Read through `generated_issues/issues_preview.md`
+2. **Create Milestones**: Set up milestones in GitHub (optional)
+3. **Create Labels**: Ensure all required labels exist (optional - will be auto-created)
+4. **Start with Security**: Consider creating Security Sprint issues first
+5. **Create All Issues**: Run `./create_issues.sh`
+6. **Organize**: Assign to milestones and team members
+7. **Prioritize**: Start with Security Sprint!
+
+## Regenerating Issues
+
+If the roadmap is updated, regenerate issues:
+
+```bash
+python3 scripts/generate_issues.py
+```
+
+This will overwrite files in `generated_issues/`.
+
+## Script Features
+
+### Parsing Capabilities
+- ✅ Extracts security sprint tasks with priorities
+- ✅ Parses milestone features (skips completed milestones)
+- ✅ Identifies security enhancements per milestone
+- ✅ Captures continuous improvement tasks
+- ✅ Preserves file references and documentation links
+
+### Issue Generation
+- ✅ Creates descriptive titles with prefixes ([Security Sprint], [M4], etc.)
+- ✅ Generates detailed issue bodies with:
+  - Description and context
+  - Task checklists
+  - Files to update (for security issues)
+  - Related documentation links
+  - Auto-generated footer
+- ✅ Applies appropriate labels based on:
+  - Priority level (critical/high/medium/low)
+  - Issue type (security/enhancement/maintenance)
+  - Milestone number
+  - Category (documentation/code-quality)
+- ✅ Assigns to appropriate milestones
+
+### Output Formats
+- ✅ JSON for programmatic import
+- ✅ Markdown for human review
+- ✅ Shell script for GitHub CLI
+
+## Next Steps
+
+1. **Review the generated issues** in `generated_issues/issues_preview.md`
+2. **Create labels and milestones** if desired (optional)
+3. **Run the import script** to create issues in GitHub
+4. **Prioritize the Security Sprint** - start working on critical security issues
+5. **Organize the remaining issues** by assigning to team members
+6. **Update the roadmap** as work progresses
+
+## Important Notes
+
+### Security First! 🔒
+The Security Remediation Sprint contains **7 critical and high-priority security issues** that should be addressed before implementing new features. These address:
+- Authentication and authorization
+- Secret management
+- XML parsing security
+- Input validation
+- Security headers
+- CORS configuration
+- Error handling
+
+### Issue Quantities
+Some milestones have more issues than others based on the roadmap structure. This is intentional and reflects the complexity and scope of each milestone.
+
+### Dependencies
+Some milestones depend on others:
+- Milestone 5 (Authentication) is foundational for later features
+- Security Sprint should complete before Milestone 4
+- See ROADMAP.md for detailed dependency information
+
+## Support
+
+- **Script Location**: `scripts/generate_issues.py`
+- **Documentation**: `generated_issues/README.md`
+- **Source**: `ROADMAP.md`
+- **Questions**: Open an issue in the DMARQ repository
+
+---
+
+**Generated**: 2026-02-06  
+**Total Issues**: 54  
+**Ready to Import**: ✅

docs/development/roadmap.md

@@ -1,201 +1,418 @@
-# Roadmap
+# DMARQ Security-Enhanced Roadmap
 
-This document outlines the planned development roadmap for DMARQ, including upcoming features, improvements, and long-term goals.
+## Document Purpose
 
-## Current Version: 1.0.0 (April 2025)
+This roadmap outlines the development plan for DMARQ with an enhanced focus on security, code quality, and preparation for agentic coding (AI-assisted development). This document supersedes previous roadmap versions with security milestones integrated throughout.
 
-The initial release of DMARQ includes:
+**Last Updated**: 2026-02-06  
+**Status**: Active Development
 
-- Basic DMARC report processing and analysis
-- Domain management
-- User authentication
-- Dashboard with key metrics
-- IMAP integration for automatic report collection
-- Simple alerting system
-- Docker deployment option
+---
 
-## Short-Term Goals (Q2-Q3 2025)
+## Current Status (Milestone 1 - COMPLETE ✅)
 
-### Version 1.1.0 (June 2025)
+### Achievements
+- ✅ Basic DMARC report parsing (XML, ZIP, GZIP)
+- ✅ In-memory storage for up to 5 domains
+- ✅ Simple dashboard UI
+- ✅ Report upload functionality
+- ✅ Domain overview with compliance stats
 
-- **Advanced Report Filtering**
-  - Filter reports by IP address
-  - Filter by authentication result
-  - Custom date range selection
-  - Save custom filters
+### Security Status
+⚠️ **Multiple critical security issues identified** - See [SECURITY.md](../../SECURITY.md) for details
 
-- **Improved Visualizations**
-  - Interactive charts with drill-down capability
-  - Geographic IP distribution map
-  - Timeline view of authentication changes
+---
 
-- **Enhanced DNS Health Checks**
-  - Automated SPF, DKIM, DMARC syntax validation
-  - Record monitoring with change detection
-  - Best practice recommendations
+## Security Remediation Sprint (PRIORITY - In Progress)
 
-- **API Enhancements**
-  - Additional endpoints for statistics
-  - Improved authentication options
-  - Better documentation and examples
+**Timeline**: Immediate (Next 2-4 weeks)  
+**Status**: 🔄 In Progress
 
-### Version 1.2.0 (August 2025)
+### Critical Fixes Required
 
-- **User Management Improvements**
-  - Role-based access control
-  - Domain-specific permissions
-  - User invitation system
-  - Activity audit logging
+#### 1. Authentication & Authorization (CRITICAL)
+- [ ] Add authentication middleware to all admin endpoints
+- [ ] Implement proper user authentication system
+- [ ] Add authorization checks on sensitive operations
+- [ ] Add rate limiting to prevent abuse
+- **Files to Fix**:
+  - `backend/app/main.py` (lines 195-196, 224-225)
+  - `backend/app/api/api_v1/endpoints/imap.py`
+  - `backend/app/api/api_v1/endpoints/domains.py`
 
-- **Multi-tenant Support**
-  - Organization-level grouping of domains
-  - Isolated views for different user groups
-  - White-labeling options
+#### 2. Secret Management (CRITICAL)
+- [ ] Remove default SECRET_KEY value
+- [ ] Add SECRET_KEY validation on startup
+- [ ] Document secret generation in deployment guide
+- [ ] Add warning if default secret is detected
+- **Files to Fix**:
+  - `backend/app/core/config.py` (line 24)
+  - Documentation updates
 
-- **Enhanced IMAP Integration**
-  - Support for multiple mailboxes
-  - Advanced filtering options
-  - Attachment preprocessing rules
+#### 3. XML Parsing Security (HIGH)
+- [ ] Replace ElementTree with defusedxml
+- [ ] Add file size limits for uploads
+- [ ] Implement zip bomb protection
+- [ ] Add malware scanning hooks (optional)
+- **Files to Fix**:
+  - `backend/app/services/dmarc_parser.py`
 
-- **Forensic Report Analysis**
-  - Improved parsing for various report formats
-  - Header analysis tools
-  - Correlation with aggregate reports
+#### 4. Input Validation (HIGH)
+- [ ] Add domain name validation regex
+- [ ] Implement file type validation (MIME + extension)
+- [ ] Add parameter validation on all endpoints
+- [ ] Sanitize error messages
+- **Files to Fix**:
+  - `backend/app/api/api_v1/endpoints/domains.py`
+  - `backend/app/api/api_v1/endpoints/reports.py`
+  - `backend/app/utils/domain_validator.py`
 
-## Mid-Term Goals (Q4 2025 - Q1 2026)
+#### 5. Security Headers (MEDIUM)
+- [ ] Add security headers middleware
+- [ ] Implement CSP (Content Security Policy)
+- [ ] Add X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options
+- [ ] Configure HSTS for production
+- **Files to Create/Modify**:
+  - `backend/app/middleware/security.py` (new)
+  - `backend/app/main.py`
 
-### Version 1.3.0 (November 2025)
+#### 6. CORS Configuration (MEDIUM)
+- [ ] Restrict CORS methods and headers
+- [ ] Remove wildcard configurations
+- [ ] Document CORS setup for deployments
+- **Files to Fix**:
+  - `backend/app/main.py` (lines 75-82)
 
-- **Integration Ecosystem**
-  - Slack/Teams notifications
-  - WebHook support for custom integrations
-  - Export to BI tools
-  - SIEM integration
+#### 7. Error Handling (MEDIUM)
+- [ ] Implement centralized error handling
+- [ ] Remove sensitive data from error responses
+- [ ] Add error logging with request context
+- [ ] Create user-friendly error messages
+- **Files to Fix**:
+  - Multiple endpoints across API layer
 
-- **Advanced Alerting System**
-  - Custom alert rules
-  - Alert severity levels
-  - Alert acknowledgment workflow
-  - Historical alert tracking
+### Testing & Validation
+- [ ] Add security-focused unit tests
+- [ ] Implement integration tests for auth flow
+- [ ] Add penetration testing checklist
+- [ ] Document security testing procedures
 
-- **DNS Management**
-  - Integration with Cloudflare API
-  - Integration with AWS Route 53
-  - One-click fix for common DNS issues
-  - DNS record deployment tracking
+### Documentation
+- [x] Create SECURITY.md
+- [ ] Update deployment guides with security best practices
+- [ ] Create security checklist for contributors
+- [ ] Add security section to API documentation
 
-- **Report Anomaly Detection**
-  - Machine learning-based anomaly detection
-  - Unusual sending pattern identification
-  - Automatic threat scoring
+---
 
-### Version 2.0.0 (February 2026)
+## Milestone 2: IMAP Integration (COMPLETE ✅ - Security Review Needed)
 
-- **Comprehensive Email Authentication Suite**
-  - SPF record management and monitoring
-  - DKIM key rotation management
-  - BIMI record support
-  - MTA-STS implementation assistance
+### Current Features
+- ✅ IMAP connection and mailbox scanning
+- ✅ Automated report fetching
+- ✅ Background task scheduler
+- ✅ Configuration UI
 
-- **Policy Management**
-  - DMARC policy transition recommendations
-  - Automated policy progression
-  - Impact analysis before policy changes
-  - Rollback capabilities
+### Security Enhancements Needed
+- [ ] **URGENT**: Remove credentials from URL parameters
+- [ ] Encrypt IMAP credentials at rest
+- [ ] Add connection timeout and retry logic
+- [ ] Implement secure credential storage (vault integration)
+- [ ] Add audit logging for IMAP operations
 
-- **Reporting Enhancements**
-  - Scheduled PDF/CSV exports
-  - Custom report templates
-  - Executive summary generation
-  - Trend analysis with predictive insights
+---
 
-- **Multi-Channel Notifications**
-  - Email notifications
-  - SMS alerts
-  - Mobile app push notifications
-  - Custom notification channels
+## Milestone 3: Database Integration & Persistence (COMPLETE ✅)
 
-## Long-Term Goals (Mid 2026+)
+### Current Features
+- ✅ SQLAlchemy ORM setup
+- ✅ SQLite/PostgreSQL support
+- ✅ Database migrations with Alembic
+- ✅ Persistent storage
 
-### Version 2.x and Beyond
+### Security Enhancements Needed
+- [ ] Add database encryption at rest
+- [ ] Implement query audit logging
+- [ ] Add prepared statement validation
+- [ ] Review and secure database credentials
+- [ ] Add database backup encryption
 
-- **Advanced Threat Intelligence**
-  - Integration with email security platforms
-  - Shared threat database
-  - Sender reputation scoring
-  - Proactive security recommendations
+---
 
-- **Enterprise Features**
-  - LDAP/Active Directory integration
-  - SAML/SSO support
-  - Advanced audit logging
-  - Custom branding
+## Milestone 4: Enhanced Dashboard & Visualization (Next - 4-6 weeks)
 
-- **Internationalization**
-  - Multi-language interface
-  - Region-specific reporting
-  - International domain support (IDN)
-  - Localized documentation
+### Planned Features
+- [ ] Historical trend charts (Chart.js integration)
+- [ ] Compliance rate visualizations
+- [ ] Volume and sender analytics
+- [ ] Time-series data displays
+- [ ] Domain comparison views
 
-- **AI-Powered Analysis**
-  - Natural language querying of report data
-  - Automated root cause analysis
-  - Predictive compliance modeling
-  - AI-assisted remediation recommendations
+### Security Considerations
+- [ ] XSS prevention in chart data
+- [ ] CSP compatibility with Chart.js
+- [ ] Rate limiting on analytics endpoints
+- [ ] Data access controls for multi-user scenarios
 
-- **Ecosystem Expansion**
-  - Mobile companion app
-  - Browser plugins
-  - Desktop notifications
-  - Command-line tools
+### Implementation
+- **Priority**: Medium
+- **Dependencies**: Security Sprint completion
+- **Estimated Effort**: 2-3 weeks
 
-## Feature Requests and Prioritization
+---
 
-We prioritize features based on:
+## Milestone 5: User Authentication & Multi-User Support (8-10 weeks)
 
-1. **User Impact**: How many users will benefit?
-2. **Security Enhancement**: Does it improve email security?
-3. **Ease of Implementation**: Can we deliver it quickly?
-4. **Strategic Alignment**: Does it align with our vision?
+### Planned Features
+- [ ] FastAPI Users integration
+- [ ] User registration and management
+- [ ] JWT-based authentication
+- [ ] Role-based access control (RBAC)
+- [ ] Password reset functionality
+- [ ] Email verification (optional)
 
-To suggest features:
+### Security Features
+- [ ] Strong password policy enforcement
+- [ ] Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
+- [ ] Session management
+- [ ] Account lockout on failed attempts
+- [ ] Security event logging
+- [ ] GDPR compliance features
 
-- Open an issue on our [GitHub repository](https://github.com/yourusername/dmarq)
-- Provide details about the feature and why it's valuable
-- Include use cases and examples when possible
+### Implementation Priority
+- **Priority**: High
+- **Security Impact**: Critical
+- **Dependencies**: Security Sprint, Milestone 4
 
-## Contribution Opportunities
+---
 
-We welcome contributions in these areas:
+## Milestone 6: Alerting & Notifications (10-12 weeks)
 
-- **Integrations**: Help build integrations with other services
-- **Documentation**: Improve guides, examples, and references
-- **UI/UX**: Enhance the user interface and experience
-- **Testing**: Add tests and improve test coverage
-- **Performance**: Optimize database queries and processing
+### Planned Features
+- [ ] Apprise integration
+- [ ] Customizable alert rules
+- [ ] Multi-channel notifications (Email, Slack, etc.)
+- [ ] Alert history and management
+- [ ] Notification preferences per user
 
-See our [Contributing Guide](contributing.md) for details on how to contribute.
+### Security Features
+- [ ] Secure webhook handling
+- [ ] Alert rate limiting
+- [ ] PII filtering in notifications
+- [ ] Encrypted notification credentials
+- [ ] Audit trail for alert configuration
 
-## Release Schedule
+---
 
-- **Major Releases**: 2 per year (February and August)
-- **Minor Releases**: Quarterly (February, May, August, November)
-- **Patch Releases**: As needed for bug fixes and security updates
+## Milestone 7: Advanced Rule Engine (14-16 weeks)
 
-## Deprecation Policy
+### Planned Features
+- [ ] Custom alert conditions
+- [ ] Threshold-based triggers
+- [ ] New sender detection
+- [ ] Anomaly detection
+- [ ] Scheduled report summaries
 
-We maintain backward compatibility where possible, but sometimes need to deprecate features:
+### Security Features
+- [ ] Rule validation and sandboxing
+- [ ] Resource limits on rule execution
+- [ ] Audit logging for rule changes
+- [ ] Protection against rule abuse
 
-1. **Announcement**: We announce deprecations at least 6 months in advance
-2. **Alternative**: We provide migration paths to alternative solutions
-3. **Support**: We continue supporting deprecated features during the transition period
-4. **Removal**: We remove features only in major version updates
+---
 
-## Feedback
+## Milestone 8: DNS Health & Cloudflare Integration (16-18 weeks)
 
-We value your feedback on our roadmap! Please share your thoughts:
+### Planned Features
+- [ ] DNS record health checks
+- [ ] SPF/DKIM/DMARC validation
+- [ ] Cloudflare API integration
+- [ ] Configuration recommendations
+- [ ] DNS change tracking
 
-- Through GitHub issues
-- In our community forums
-- During community calls
-- Via email to roadmap@example.com
+### Security Features
+- [ ] Secure API credential storage
+- [ ] DNS query rate limiting
+- [ ] DNSSEC validation
+- [ ] Audit logging for DNS operations
+- [ ] Read-only DNS access (no auto-changes initially)
+
+---
+
+## Milestone 9: Forensic Reports (RUF) Support (20-22 weeks)
+
+### Planned Features
+- [ ] Forensic report parsing
+- [ ] Failure sample analysis
+- [ ] PII redaction options
+- [ ] Detailed authentication failure views
+- [ ] Sample download/export
+
+### Security Features
+- [ ] PII detection and redaction
+- [ ] Access controls for sensitive data
+- [ ] Audit logging for forensic data access
+- [ ] Compliance with privacy regulations
+- [ ] Secure export with encryption
+
+---
+
+## Milestone 10: Advanced Analytics & Reporting (24-26 weeks)
+
+### Planned Features
+- [ ] Historical trend analysis
+- [ ] Comparative reporting
+- [ ] Export capabilities (PDF, CSV)
+- [ ] Scheduled reports
+- [ ] Custom dashboards
+
+### Security Features
+- [ ] Export sanitization
+- [ ] Watermarking for exported reports
+- [ ] Access logging for exports
+- [ ] Encrypted export files
+
+---
+
+## Milestone 11: Enterprise Features (28-30+ weeks)
+
+### Planned Features
+- [ ] Multi-tenant architecture
+- [ ] API rate limiting
+- [ ] Advanced RBAC
+- [ ] SSO integration (SAML, OAuth)
+- [ ] Compliance reporting (SOC 2, GDPR)
+- [ ] High availability setup
+- [ ] Backup and disaster recovery
+
+### Security Features
+- [ ] Tenant isolation
+- [ ] Advanced audit logging
+- [ ] Security event monitoring
+- [ ] Compliance automation
+- [ ] Regular security assessments
+
+---
+
+## Continuous Improvements (Ongoing)
+
+### Code Quality
+- [ ] Maintain >80% test coverage
+- [ ] Regular dependency updates
+- [ ] Code review for all changes
+- [ ] Performance optimization
+- [ ] Technical debt reduction
+
+### Security
+- [ ] Monthly security audits
+- [ ] Automated vulnerability scanning (GitHub Actions)
+- [ ] Dependency security monitoring
+- [ ] Regular penetration testing
+- [ ] Security training for contributors
+
+### Documentation
+- [ ] Keep documentation current
+- [ ] API documentation completeness
+- [ ] Security best practices guide
+- [ ] Deployment playbooks
+- [ ] Troubleshooting guides
+
+### Community
+- [ ] Issue triage and response
+- [ ] PR review and merging
+- [ ] Community engagement
+- [ ] Feature request evaluation
+- [ ] Bug fix prioritization
+
+---
+
+## Security Milestones Integration
+
+Each development milestone now includes security considerations:
+
+| Milestone | Security Priority | Key Security Features |
+|-----------|------------------|----------------------|
+| Security Sprint | 🔴 Critical | Fix all critical vulnerabilities |
+| Milestone 4 | 🟡 Medium | XSS prevention, CSP |
+| Milestone 5 | 🔴 Critical | Authentication, RBAC, MFA |
+| Milestone 6 | 🟠 High | Secure webhooks, PII filtering |
+| Milestone 7 | 🟠 High | Rule sandboxing, audit trails |
+| Milestone 8 | 🟠 High | API security, DNSSEC |
+| Milestone 9 | 🔴 Critical | PII redaction, compliance |
+| Milestone 10 | 🟡 Medium | Export security, watermarking |
+| Milestone 11 | 🔴 Critical | Enterprise security, SOC 2 |
+
+---
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+### Functional
+- All planned features implemented
+- Performance meets requirements
+- User experience is intuitive
+- Documentation is complete
+
+### Security
+- Zero critical vulnerabilities
+- All high-severity issues resolved
+- Security tests pass
+- Regular security audits pass
+- Compliance requirements met
+
+### Quality
+- >80% code coverage
+- All tests passing
+- No critical bugs
+- Performance benchmarks met
+- Code review approval
+
+---
+
+## Risk Management
+
+### Technical Risks
+- **Risk**: Complex security implementations
+  - **Mitigation**: Incremental approach, expert review
+- **Risk**: Performance degradation with security features
+  - **Mitigation**: Performance testing, optimization
+
+### Resource Risks
+- **Risk**: Limited security expertise
+  - **Mitigation**: External security audits, community review
+- **Risk**: Time constraints for security work
+  - **Mitigation**: Prioritize critical issues first
+
+### Operational Risks
+- **Risk**: Breaking changes with security fixes
+  - **Mitigation**: Thorough testing, clear documentation
+- **Risk**: User adoption of security features
+  - **Mitigation**: Clear communication, good UX
+
+---
+
+## Contributing to This Roadmap
+
+This roadmap is a living document. To contribute:
+
+1. Review current milestones and status
+2. Propose changes via GitHub Issues
+3. Discuss in community forums
+4. Submit PRs for roadmap updates
+5. Participate in planning discussions
+
+See [CONTRIBUTING.md](../../CONTRIBUTING.md) for detailed guidelines.
+
+---
+
+## References
+
+- [SECURITY.md](../../SECURITY.md) - Security policy and vulnerability reporting
+- [CONTRIBUTING.md](../../CONTRIBUTING.md) - Contribution guidelines
+- [Agentic Coding Guidelines](agents.md) - AI-assisted development guidelines
+- [Milestones](../milestones.md) - Detailed milestone specifications
+- [Todo](../todo.md) - Detailed task tracking
+
+---
+
+**Maintained by**: DMARQ Development Team  
+**Contact**: See [SECURITY.md](../../SECURITY.md) for contact information